Competency Based Learning, Online Education and Lamar Alexander’s ESEA Revisions

Posted: October 17, 2015 in Uncategorized

  1. bunger

(A special thanks to Allison McDowell for provoking me to this research and to an amazing blog by Emily Talmage  that had mad amounts of information on this subject)

This has been over a decade on the making. In 2000 Business Week  listed the companies benefiting from the new boon in online education stating, “Dozens of new companies are springing up to serve the emerging K-12 market for digital learning. Investors have poured nearly $1 billion into these companies since the beginning of 1999, estimates Merrill Lynch.”

The development of what we now call Common Core, competency-based learning and the online education industry have a long history. Click here for more on that.

Begin with ALEC Model Legislation  called Resolution Adopting the 10 Elements of High-Quality Digital Learning for K-12

One element which states, “Advancement: Students progress based on demonstrated competency.”

This resolution was adopted in 2011 following a proposal crafted by Bob Wise and Jeb Bush. Tom Vander Ark, also proclaims himself an “architect of Digital Learning Now’s 10 Elements of Digital Learning”

Tom Vander Ark was the first business executive to serve as a public school superintendent and was the first executive director for education at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Mr. Vander Ark is chairman of theBoard of Directors for iNACOL, the International Association for K-12 Online Learning. You can see his blog.

Bob Wise and Jeb Bush along with Bill Gates were central to the development of the Common Core State Standards. These standards are an integral part of the new online competency based network.

According to Talmage: “A paper produced by the Gates Foundation describing current investments related to Common Core has a section titled “Proficiency-Based Pathways.” The report states that “conditions are ripe for creating personalized learning opportunities beyond school—in an anytime, anywhere fashion,” and that “we believe it’s possible with the convergence of the Common Core State Standards, the work on new standards-based assessments, the development of new data systems, and the rapid growth of technology-enabled learning experiences.”

Achieve (instrumental in development of CCSS) helps create state policy frameworks for graduation requirements tied to career and college ready standards.

According to a promotional flyer created by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation:

“Education leaders have long talked about setting rigorous standards and allowing students more or less time as needed to demonstrate mastery of subjects and skills. This has been more a promise than a reality, but we believe it’s possible with the convergence of the Common Core State Standards, the work on new standards-based assessments, the development of new data systems, and the rapid growth of technology-enabled learning experiences.” 

In 2010, the Foundation for Excellence in Education convened the Digital Learning Council, a diverse group of more than 100 leaders in education, government, philanthropy, business, technology and members of policy think tanks led by Co Chairmen Jeb Bush, and Bob Wise.  The 10 Elements of High-Quality Digital Learning were released at this 2010 National Summit on Education Reform. It’s an ALEC model-endorsedcomprehensive framework of state-level policies and actions “designed to advance the meaningful and thoughtful integration of technology into K12 public education.”

Read the full list of members and advisors (I am sure you will recognize quite a few of these names central to the ed reform playbook—hint: yes, Gates is in there). This policy is further promoted by International Association for K12 Online Learning (iNACOL) in their website statement:

“Digital Learning Now’s Roadmap For Reform provides lawmakers, Governors, and policymakers with tangible steps to transform education into a model for the world, a system where every student graduates from high school with the skills and knowledge to succeed in college and careers.”

On the Board of Dircetors of iNACOL is Nicholas C. Donohue who serves as President and CEO Nellie Mae Education Foundation “Which has been on the receiving end of the Gates Foundation’s investments in developing and promoting the concept of “proficiency based” education has been the Nellie Mae EducationFoundation, a non-profit that retained 250 million dollars as an endowment when it separated from the Nellie Mae Corporation in 1998. In 2010, the Nellie Mae Education Foundation also received 1.7 million dollars from the Gates Foundation.” Talmage.

Also  the vice chair of board of directors is Mickey Ravenaugh Executive Vice President Connections Learning. Notably she is the former co-chair of the Education Task Force for ALEC.

Also remember Tom Vanderark proclaimed architect of this bill is also on board of directors. He uses his blog for self promotional webinars and posts.

Competency Based Learning meets Online Education

In Maine, we are witnessing this very experiment take place in our schools in the form of proficiency-based learning. The Nellie Mae report writes, ‘Schools and districts are developing increasingly mature competency-based pathways and approaches that others can study and potentially replicate.’ States that have not adopted proficiency-based learning will look in the future to data gathered from students and schools in Maine when deciding whether or not to adopt similar legislation to LD 1422.”

The connections between state legislation in Maine and ALEC edutech companies going back to 2012 can also be found here.

HERE’s THE PUNCH LINE

Add another ALEC model bill called “Statewide Online Education Act”:

“This legislation creates a statewide program that provides high school students with access to online learning options regardless of where the student lives. The options are designed to be high quality and allow for maximized learning potential by focusing on student mastery of subjects at their own pace and own time, instead of the traditional seat-time learning requirements.”

Also see ALEC model legislation “Course Choice Program Act”

You can see now why Lamar Alexander’s re authorization of ESEA promoted a return to the states for decision making about assessment. It’s not the tests. It’s the online ed tech corporations that can now deliver state-wide curriculum and instruction. The ESEA reauth says states would be “responsible for establishing asingle statewide accountability system which differentiates between schools based on student achievement, and would determine specific interventions for identified schools.  The bill does not list specific strategies or requirements that must be used for these interventions.”

But the ALEC bills make clear what strategies will be used. The ALEC Statewide Online Act bill states: “The Statewide Online Education Program is designated as a program of the public education system.” Let’s review the beginning here: The 10 Elements of High-Quality Digital Learning for K-12 is “a comprehensive framework of state-level policies and actions designed to advance the meaningful and thoughtful integration of technology into K12 public education.”

This is a timely piece of model legislation given Lamar Alexander’s re authorization of ESEA giving states control over curriculum and assessment. While I am an advocate of the elimination of federally mandated testing and the opt out movement, we should have known better to trust Senator Alexander. One of the things this bill does is: “It lets states develop accountability systems – restoring to states the responsibility for determining how to use federally required tests for accountability purposes. States will also be permitted to include other measures of student and school performance in their accountability systems in order to provide teachers, parents, and other stakeholders with a more accurate determination of school performance.”

In addition to opening the flood gates to charter schools (aka online edu tech companies) “This bill affirms a State’s responsibility to identify and eliminate barriers to the coordination and integration of programs, initiatives, and funding streams, and provide technical assistance and training in order to disseminate best practices.”

Heck, even Microsoft is applauding the bill! (hashtag- not shocked). http://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2015/07/17/every-child-achieves-act-will-improve-access-to-k-12-stem-learning-nationwide/

See this link for iNACOL Statement on Support for Competency Education in Senate ESEA Reauthorization Discussion” in which they state:

“The International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL) applauds Chairman Lamar Alexander for taking the first step to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) by releasing a discussion draft that includes encouraging elements for supporting next generation accountability systems…and establish the option to implement competency-based systems of assessments.”http://www.bizjournals.com/prnewswire/press_releases/2015/01/15/DC08771

Oh, did I mention that iNACOL is a member of ALEC?

Did we REALLY ever believe that handing testing and assessment back to the states was going to be a “win” for the opt out movement knowing who it was behind the scenes crafting the legislation?

iNACOL proclaims: “A key challenge for Congress will be ensuring that a reauthorization of ESEA increases equity in our K-12 education system while rethinking how assessments and accountability systems are structured. iNACOL looks forward to working with Chairman Alexander on an ESEA reauthorization that begins a transformation of our education system to student centered learning.”

THERE IT IS.

We have gone from the frying pan into the fire. So light it up.

 

Comments
  1. So grateful that you found my blog and shared my research…. Your blog has been a great resource to me in the past as well! We are in major trouble in Maine… Please keep tabs on what’s happening here… We need help.

  2. […] Check out which organizations are pushing this “student-centered” concept most heavily, and who funds them: the Gates Foundation, spin-offs of the student-loan industry, the American Legislative Exchange Council, and every variety of online and digital educational-product company  out there. Read about what’s happening here in Maine.  Get even more details here.  […]

  3. Jill says:

    Thank you for exposing the behind the scenes wheeling and dealing, involving ALEC and such. Important for us all to know!

  4. […] Competency Based Learning, Online Education and Lamar Alexander’s ESEA Revisions […]

  5. […] they call it behind closed doors is PROFITS AND PRIVATIZATION. Alexander’s ESEA revisions are leading the […]

  6. […] they call it behind closed doors is PROFITS AND PRIVATIZATION. Alexander’s ESEA revisions are leading the […]

  7. […] Competency Based Learning, Online Education and Lamar Alexander’s ESEA Revisions […]

  8. […] as the corporate-driven personalized, digital learning craze sweeps the country, Dance has jumped in headfirst and is bringing his district along with […]

  9. […] as the corporate-driven personalized, digital learning craze sweeps the country, Dance has jumped in headfirst and is bringing his district along with […]

  10. […] Competency Based Learning, Online Education and Lamar Alexander’s ESEA Revisions, by Morna McDermott […]

  11. […] they call it behind closed doors is PROFITS AND PRIVATIZATION. Alexander’s ESEA revisions are leading the […]

  12. […] Elements of the re-authorization of ESEA (“Every Child Achieves Act”) make this possible. In my previous blog: […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s