“Career and College Ready?”
Pearson, of course, was ahead of the pack as usual… developing a school- to -labor pipeline that suites the corporate masters. As this blog explains, Competency Based Education becomes the framework for “badges” instead of credit hours and prepares students for career and college which is code for the new “gig” economy. According to Pearson: “Alternative learning credentials including college coursework, self-directed learning experiences, career training, and continuing education programs can play a powerful role in defining and articulating solo workers’ capabilities. Already badges that represent these credentials are serving an important purpose in fostering trust between solo workers, employers, and project teams because they convey skill transparency and deliver seamless verification of capabilities.”
I could -at this point -just say ’nuff said.
But I won’t.
First, a brief background: Competency based education (or CBE) has been a rapidly developing alternative to traditional public education. While proponents tout it as “disruptive innovation” critics examine how disruptive translates into “dismantle”, meaning that CBE is a system by which public schools can, and will be, dismantled. This is not ancillary. It was designed to create a new privately-run profiteering model by which education can be delivered to “the masses.” Think: Outsourcing.
CBE delivers curriculum, instruction and assessments through online programming owned by third-party (corporate) organizations that are paid for with your tax dollars. Proponents of CBE use catchy language like “personalized” and “individualized” learning. Translation? Children seated alone interfacing with a computer, which monitors and adjusts the materials according to the inputs keyed in by the child. See Newton’s Datapalooza here.
So gone are the days of “credit hours” earned by spending a certain amount of hours in a classroom. Instead, children move at an individual pace detached from the larger group or collaborative learning experiences which CBE pimps try to warn us are ‘keeping certain kids back” from their “true potential.”
The immediate advantages of control and profits for the neoliberal privatizers is quite evident and well documented. See Talmage for more on CBE history and my own summary here.
Let’s summarize what the outcomes of the CBE paradigm of public schools will be:
- Disenfranchises teachers who are replaced by computers and third party providers (now LEA’s with access to student private data). This erodes a unionized teacher workforce.
- Eliminates collaborative interactive learning activities in favor of individualized one-on-one learning with a computer program
- Course credit will no longer be counted by credit hour but by completion of a series of exercises, tasks or data driven curriculum which provides the student with a “badge of completion” (see Pearson). The amount of time spent in a classroom experience is no longer a determining factor in evaluating success.
In their own words, The Business Round Table explained how Career and College ready objectives are designed in the likeness of their corporate sponsors. The Common Employability Skills paper states: “Educators and other learning providers will also have an industry-defined road map for what foundational skills to teach, providing individuals the added benefit of being able to evaluate educational programs to ensure they will in fact learn skills that employers value.”
Let me restate that again: “EDUCATORS WILL HAVE AN INDUSTRY-DEFINED ROAD MAP.”
The industry road map today in 2016 leads to a gig economy.
What’s a Gig?
Meet the gig economy. What exactly is a gig economy? It’s what CBE becomes when it’s all grown up and graduated. According to gig economy critic Stephen Hill: The gig economy is “….a weird yet historic mash-up of Silicon Valley technology and Wall Street greed” which is being thrust “upon us (as) the latest economic fraud: the so-called ‘sharing economy,’ with companies like Uber, Airbnb and TaskRabbit allegedly ‘liberating workers’ ’to become ‘independent’ and ‘their own CEOs,’ hiring themselves out for ever-smaller jobs and wages while the companies profit”.
If the history of public schools in America is the history of labor production and preparation (i.e. 19th c factory model schools for a factory society) it holds true that we are now trying to create gig-driven schools to prepare children for the new gig economy. Just as factory model schools prepared children for factory jobs, it’s no coincidence that the CBE framework is a “mini me” of the gig economy itself. And the CBE framework was developed and is funded by the same corporations and organizations like iNACOL and ALEC who are the profiteers of a new gig economy. Just think of how the gig-driven culture reflects the long awaited goals of ALEC model legislation which dismantle collective bargaining, living wages, and other labor rights.
In 2015 the ALEC Commerce Task Force “Celebrated the ‘Gig’ Economy” at an event in which they held workshops on the “Gig Economy” and “What’s Next for the ‘Sharing Economy’–A Discussion on Principles on Best Practices,” which will likely lay the groundwork for further efforts to undermine worker protections. Naturally, their model bills sponsored by the Education task force members directly intersect with the model bills put forth by the Labor task force as well.
In response to this 2015 event, ALEC bragged in their own website that, “With new policies ranging from reducing the income tax burden, to deregulating the ‘gig economy,’ to pension reform, good news in Arizona is plentiful.”
The National Network of Business and Industry Associations, calls itself “an innovative partnership that joins 25 organizations focused on better connecting learning and work.” Their goal is to develop tools that:
- articulate the common employability skills required for workers across all career fields;
- rethink how various professional organizations build credentials to help workers move easily between professions (think: Open Badges); and
- increase the use of competency-based hiring practices across the entire economy (Pay for Success).
One can begin to see how easily CBE fits in with the BRT goal in their Common Employability Skills document where they write: “This model can take its place as the foundation for all industries to map skill requirements to credentials and to career paths.” They add that educational institutions will be EVALUATED based on their ability “to ensure students will in fact learn skills that employers value.”
So let’s summarize ….
In a gig economy, gone is the routine 9-5 work hours by which traditional salaries are determined. Instead gig jobs are paid by the completion of tasks regardless of the hours.
In a freelance world, where jobs are merely a series of gigs strung together, the new ESSA “pay for success” framework fits right in.
Pay for Success is a gig framework for education.
So when jobs are free lanced there is little opportunity for a unionized workforce and there are no benefits (thanks ALEC). There is no collective work space or shared workforce experience. Most work can be done independently, online, and from home. After 12 years of schooling under this framework the future workers of America will be primed to fall right into their pre-ordained place in the gig economy, where they will now feel right at home.
Just as “manufacturing companies and Silicon Valley have begun increasingly to rely on private contractors to hire temps and freelancers” (Hill, 2016) so have public schools, with the advent of the new ESSA bill, increasingly use private contractors to provide public education (temps being TFA and freelancers represented by Pearson, K12 Inc and the like).
Gig proponents might call it “independent” labor which “frees” workers from the messy attachment to brick and mortar workplaces and money tied to work hours. It’s the mirror image of CBE proponents advocating for students to be “freed” of credit hours tied to hours spent in brick and mortar classrooms.
The gig advocates mantra of “We don’t have to hold on to the model of the 40-hour workweek for a corporate employer” eerily reflects the CBE reform mantra of “students should not have to hold on to credit hours for a traditional model of education.”
Just as CBE has become the bastion of cost-effectiveness in education for profits to CBE delivery systems in a world of austerity (neoliberal capitalism on steroids), so the gig economy streamlines the costs to corporations- who can now eliminate messy expenses like your 401k, health insurance, unemployment insurance.
This project-to-project freelance society (as opposed to long term consistent employment within one organization) will not trouble a student who has freelanced their way through school, from Open badge to Open badge, with no sense of collaborative or collective sensibilities in their learning experiences, or familiarity with relationships between time and place representative of stability or community. In this freelance society and freelance education system, people cobble together a string of independent “gigs” in which they work independently at their own pace. Gig workers are never really “on the clock” because they are never “really off the clock” either–just as CBE students are never focused on time in learning, but are focused on pushing through each module of the CBE framework in order to accumulate “credits” as quickly as possible.
Another way of conceiving of Pay for Success is the “Learning is Earning” framework, which outlines how CBE and the gig economy work together.
According to Pearson:
“A decade from now, when solo workers comprise the majority of the American workforce, I think it will be common for all of us to point to digital credentials and badges as a better way to talk about our own expertise and the know-how of others. Trusted digital credentials will strengthen the new economy by removing some of the high-frequency friction and inefficiencies of project work. Digital, verifiable credentials owned by each worker will ease employer uncertainty while forming project teams. And at the same time, badges will help each of us to identify relevant new work projects and navigate toward just-in-time (aka “gig”) learning opportunities.”
Also read about LinkedIn, CBE and gig economics here.
Gig employers and CBE policy makers tout this as “freedom”—freedom from stability and security, for sure.
Nunberg, in his NPR commentary suggests, “If “gig” suggests the independence you get when you’re not tied down to a steady lifetime job, then just think of the freedom we’ll all enjoy when the traditional job is consigned to the scrap heap of history, and the economy is just gigs all the way down.” I fear that public education, no longer tied down to time or place, like stable jobs, will too be consigned to the scrap heap of history.
13 thoughts on “CBE and ALEC Preparing Students for the Gig Economy”
Outstanding, excellent no one has said seen and connected the like you.just great.
This is so crucially important for people to understand! I just started reading Knocking the Hustle: Against the Neoliberal Turn in Black Politics by Lester K. Spence. I think it resonates well with what you’ve described here. We are at the tipping point of a sinister, dystopian society. Only raising awareness has the potential to stop it. Also, I’m wondering why I didn’t notice any workshops focused on CBE or digital learning on the agenda for the SOS/UOO/et al rally/march/conference in July.
Awesome must read for all teachers, parents, and students.
Reblogged this on Poetic Justice and commented:
This is a must read for all teachers, parents, and students. Do we really want our children reduced to “gigs” and data points?
The corporate horror story is a big part of it, but–in 2014, NEA embraced CBE in higher education, going so far as to write a letter to Congress urging passage of CBE initiatives. This was one year after NEA collected over $7 million from the Gates Foundation for “improving education”:
Sorry, wrong link:
Baltimore County Public Schools’ vision in a big nutshell: “The Department of Innovative Learning is dedicated to providing a quality, comprehensive educational program designed to address the needs of a diverse student population through the development and implementation of personalized digital learning environments.
The goal of the Department of Innovative Learning is to ensure that every student will experience high academic achievement and continuous growth by participating in a rigorous instructional program designed to raise the academic bar and close achievement gaps so that every student will become a globally competitive citizen in a culturally diverse world.
The Department of Innovative Learning will ensure a learner-centered, personalized, blended environment powered by digital learning and interactive curriculum access that is flexible anytime and anywhere by:
1.Developing, implementing, and expanding a digital platform for curriculum development and delivery that widens teachers’ access to methods and materials that reach diverse learners and provides flexible access for staff, students, and parents.
2.Expanding prekindergarten through grade 12 opportunities for e-learning, virtual learning, and blended learning opportunities to individualize instruction for every student and ensure that every student has access to the curriculum.
3.Providing virtual learning opportunities for all courses required for high school graduation.”
Another excellent blog post making the connection between school and work. Neither option sounds good to me and I cringe to think of kids being cheated so blatantly. I am reflagging on Friday with the title——Do you want to be a task rabbit?
Hang in there. Enjoy your kids.
Ann Bracken Poet~Author~Creator of Possibilities http://www.annbrackenauthor.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/annbrackenauthor?ref=bookmarks Twitter: @annbracken52
“Poetry is an act of peace. Peace goes into the making of a poet as flour goes into the making of bread.” ~ Pablo Neruda